HCP Live
Contagion LiveCGT LiveNeurology LiveHCP LiveOncology LiveContemporary PediatricsContemporary OBGYNEndocrinology NetworkPractical CardiologyRheumatology Netowrk

Low-Dose Ticagrelor Safe, Effective in Clopidogrel-Resistant Patients

A retrospective chart review from ISC 2022 details the safety and efficacy of low-dose ticagrelor in clopidogrel-resistant neuroendovascular patients.

This article was originally published on NeurologyLive.com.

A lower dose of ticagrelor was safe and effective in clopidogrel-resistant patients, according to a small study presented at the International Stroke Conference (ISC) 2022.

Results of the study also suggested clopidogrel-resistant patients in the study also had increased risk of ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes, as a result of neurovascular pathologies and implants.

Investigators, led by Sonam Thind, NP, Neuro-Endovascular Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, performed a retrospective chart review between 2013 and 2017. Included charts were for patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for either cervical or intracranial vascular pathologies, in addition to stenting of the neurovasculature, including carotid arteries. A total of 39 patients were included in analyses, with a mean number of 532 days for follow-up post-treatment initiation. The P2Y12 test was used to measure patients’ responsiveness to ticagrelor.

Eight patients (21%) received implantation of intracranial stents, 5 of whom received pipeline embolization devices, 2 of whom received intracranial stents for atherosclerotic disease, and 1 of whom received stent-assisted coiling. Fourteen patients (35%) received carotid angioplasty and stenting, and 17 patients (44%) did not receive permanent implantation of a stent. All of those who received a lower dose of ticagrelor of mg BID were responsive as per the P2Y12 test. One hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke was reported for 1 patient (2.5%), but there were no other hemorrhagic complications. Additionally, 1 patient (2.5%) with intracranial atherosclerotic disease reported an ischemic event, but there were no other thromboembolic events recorded.

If patient-measured PRU responses to clopidogrel were outside of the expected range at investigators’ center, per the P2Y12 test, they were placed on ticagrelor. One patient received 22.5 mg BID, but the remaining 38 patients were maintained on a dose of 45 mg BID.

“There is a growing use of ticagrelor in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures, especially those who demonstrate clopidogrel resistance,” investigators wrote. “While multiple dosages are studied in the cardiology literature, the optimal dose for patients with neurological pathology has yet to be established. Here we describe a single center experience involving 39 patients who underwent neuroendovascular procedures that then received an adjusted lower dose of ticagrelor.”

A separate meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference of recurrent stroke or death at 90 days using DAPT approach of either ticagrelor and aspirin or clopidogrel and aspirin, but both approaches were found to be superior to aspirin alone. Investigators used data from 5 randomized clinical trials that enrolled patients with acute minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack who were treated with either 2 DAPT interventions within 72 hours of symptom onset, with a minimum follow-up of 30 days.

Of the 22,098 patients included in the analysis, 5517 (24.9%) of which were on clopidogrel and aspirin, 5859 (26.5%) treated with ticagrelor and aspirin, and 10,722 (48.5%) on aspirin alone. At the end of the study, investigators concluded that both clopidogrel and aspirin (HR, 0.74 [95% Cl, 0.65-0.84]) and ticagrelor and aspirin (HR, 0.79 [95% Cl, 0.68-0.91]) were superior to aspirin alone in the prevention of the primary end point, although there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 treatment arms themselves (HR, 0.79 [95% Cl, 0.78-1.13]).

Another recent study found that long-term DAPT with cilostazol was more effective for secondary prevention of noncardioembolic stroke than monotherapy in high-risk patients who started the medication 15 days or later after stroke onset, when compared with those who started during the 8-14-day window. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either monotherapy with aspirin (81 mg or 100 mg) or clopidogrel (50 mg or 75 mg) once daily or dual therapy with cilostazol (100 mg, twice daily) and either aspirin (81 mg or 100 mg) or clopidogrel (50 mg or 75 mg), once daily.

At the conclusion of the analysis, there was a significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction observed for the primary efficacy outcome, or first recurrence of ischemic stroke, between assigned treatment and trichotomized groups (15-28D: P=.07; 29-180D: P=.022; and 15-180D combined: P=.012; all compared with the 8-14D group).

This study, "An alternative reduced dose regimen of ticagrelor for neuroendovascular patients," was presented at ISC 2022.